How to fix roundup.org's customizing.txt
"John P. Rouillard" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all: I just checked in a fix to the customizing.txt documentation. One of the examples stopped working sometime in the 1.4 release I think when the new search permissions were added. See the mailing list thread ending at: https://sourceforge.net/p/roundup/mailman/message/36408780/ The current head documentation is now correct. Any thoughts on how to fix this on the web site? I can't use the current head doc as it has a change to reference things that are only applicable with the python 3 patches (the change to using gpg rather than pyme for PGP signed email). Also I don't want to grab the whole doc suite because of other incompatible changes. I can branch from the 1.6.0 release and do the update, but I would really like to keep all the changes in the head except for the gpg/pyme change as the majority of them fix documentation issues (obsolete URL's) that I couldn't fix in time for the 1.6.0 release. As I see it I can do one of 3 things: 1) do nothing with the web site and leave the example in customizing.txt broken. Advantage: the online doc exactly matches the released doc and can be reproduced from hg. Disadvantage: people looking for a working example won't find it. 2) check out the current customizing.txt, manually roll back the gpg to pyme reference and publish. Advantage: example works works and url's to supplimentary docs also work. Disadvantage: doc not in hg, doc doesn't match released 1.6.0 doc. 3) branch the doc in hg (to 1.6.0_branch), roll back the gpg/pyme change and publish that. Advantage: in hg and reproducable if we need to do another 1.6.x release not based on trunk, working example and url's. Disadvantage: not the same as released 1.6.0, need to figure out how to do the required hg work. Thoughts? -- -- rouilj John Rouillard =========================================================================== My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot