Re: Do we keep 3rdParty/bootstrap? Put licenses in templates.
Bernhard Reiter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi John, Am Samstag 28 Dezember 2019 02:45:54 schrieb John P. Rouillard: > Does anybody know of a reason we need to have the original 2.2.2 > sources in the roundup repo? trying to remember, the idea back then was to have a complete set of sources together. A certain version of bootstrap may not be available anymore in the future and we want to be rebuildable. That is a small plus for packaging. (And I hope we get more packaging of roundup back.) I have a light tendency to keep a copy of the sources for completeness reasons, but if it makes a lot of work, I can live with not having it. > In both cases, it looks like we need to distribute the proper version > of the license file. Yes, we should ship the proper verison of the license file. (I did not check about which would be a good place for it.) Regards, Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3 Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Roundup-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEELheSPXYdkVSywaF2PEP0yO/11CoFAl4J71gACgkQPEP0yO/1 1CooTwgApAZjSNaFePjJ0H2fdST2NHqEpTyGM5DhH2Q8o+mumb5g0uYwDBz5nmEk C4aJhX2UhiZwrzU8HlfH7WHb5mOThCIHOSWONi2XuS6QT5kYThsEnZ957B5XRkyD nHRoOkwVimIDwrvtEa14L4405gNhHQZybq7q9FSvP55a8xRlPCu8/ASci4GiDfJH 0WliCTRIemnUfvroJNSXpIwvOskyVVKj+3GLv6fIY/dqJ3vhjXG/e62UOzp67V0F ir2yobBAaxcqrZBWyjy0mPOpD3rM07pUFdOeDYdsmL2SRIvkFnxeoljm6crJXYUe MHKs+dsphb82qfCa6Wxh+7VnYuQl7g== =1/Db -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----