Re: Should web (html, xmlrpc, rest) and email intefaces refuse retired users?

Ralf Schlatterbeck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 04:42:44PM -0400, John P. Rouillard wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> Just had a discussion with a new roundup user. He wanted to delete a
> user rather than retire. In discussion I looked to see if retiring a
> user had any effect on their ability to login, send email, use
> xmlrpc/rest interfaces.
> 
> None of the above code paths require that the user is un-retired to
> work.
> 
> Should retiring a user block all interaction with roundup (same as if
> no role are defined for the user)? Also if the user's email address is
> found should emails be bounced in the mail gateway?

Yes, probably.
I have added a 'user_status' field in my trackers. And there is a
reactor that sets the roles of the user to empty when the status goes
from 'valid' to 'obsolete'. Modelling this with a status makes it easier
to resurrect a user :-)

Ralf
-- 
Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck                  Tel:   +43/2243/26465-16
Open Source Consulting                  www:   www.runtux.com
Reichergasse 131, A-3411 Weidling       email: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.