Re: mailgw argument parsing
Thomas Arendsen Hein <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:11:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Ralf Schlatterbeck <[email protected]> [20221122 14:44]: > -S issue.issueprop1=value1;issueprop2=value2 Ah, even shorter (though you'd have to protect the ; from being parsed by the shell) > Note the missing class on the second property (and you cannot combine > different classes in a single -S option). So I guess adding an > additional syntax there would only confuse people. Yes, that would be confusing. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Arendsen Hein <[email protected]> | https://intevation.de Intevation GmbH, Osnabrueck, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrueck, HRB 18998 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter