Re: Is doc/security.txt still relevant? Reuse for security policy/announce?
Ralf Schlatterbeck <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:37:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 02:26:09AM -0500, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > I have been looking at security.txt. It looks like a lot of the info > there hasn't been changed since 2002. > > I propose moving it to security-history.txt and changing the reference > in upgrading.txt to it. Yes! > I will create a new security.txt will include: [...] Great! > Thoughts? Does anybody know if mercurial (and git) will be ok with > this rename and replacement? Git is fine, especially if you do the replacement in a single step it will know that the file has been renamed. I've repeatedly tried to get rid of Mercurial :-) Ralf -- Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck Tel: +43/2243/26465-16 Open Source Consulting www: www.runtux.com Reichergasse 131, A-3411 Weidling email: [email protected]