Re: [issue2551294] REST API header checks cannot be turned off
"John P. Rouillard" <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Oct 2023 11:05:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ralf: In message <[email protected]>, Ralf Schlatterbeck writes: >New submission from Ralf Schlatterbeck: > >I was just bitten hard by the new behavior that not all header checks for REST can be turned off in the config.ini: I'm always getting:: > > { "error": { "status": 400, "msg": "Required Header Missing" } } Which headers are you sending? IIRC there are to places with that output for RES. Origin and X-requested-With. The latter can be disabled. Do you have x-requested-with turned off? Can you tell if the client is sending the Origin header? >Unfortunately I've not found anything about this in any of the upgrading docs. Yeah, we don't have a lot of REST users, so.... Which version did you upgrade from when it was working? >Looks like the 'Origin' header check is hard-coded in roundup/cgi/client.py >for the API, in handle_rest we have:: > > if not self.is_origin_header_ok(api=True): > if 'HTTP_ORIGIN' not in self.env: > msg = self._("Required Header Missing") > else: > msg = self._("Client is not allowed to use Rest Interface.") > > # Use code 400. Codes 401 and 403 imply that authentication > # is needed or authenticated person is not authorized. > # Preflight doesn't do authentication. > output = s2b( > '{ "error": { "status": 400, "msg": "%s" } }' % msg) > self.reject_request(output, > message_type="application/json", > status=400) > return > >So this does not use the csrf_enforce_header_origin in the config. >>From the comments it looks like this might be intended to only be >hit on a preflight check. But it is hit any time a POST is issued to >the tracker. That sounds right. Post's do a pre-flight IIRC and they should always send an Origin. From the docs on preflight: Also these requests bypass CSRF checks except for the Origin header check which is always run for preflight requests. >Even when authenticated. I'm using Kerberos Authentication behind an >apache2 webserver. I think a csrf request would get your session tokens. >Is this intentional? IIRC forcing origin is intentional. >I can see why one would enforce at least one header with REST but >unfortunately I have a very important legacy app that I have no >influence on. You believe it's not sending an Origin? IIRC there is a different error if the Origin doesn't match the Roundup server. But allowed_api_origins might be of use if you think that's the issue. Sorry I don't have a good answer for you. -- -- rouilj John Rouillard =========================================================================== My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.