Re: Attachment spam: do we want to edit history?
Bernhard Reiter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 16:50:48 schrieb Ralf Schlatterbeck: > Yes, lets hear what others think before taking any actions that can't be > undone. I believe for spam there should be a way to completely remove it (which means editing history). However there can be precautions, I'd say that ideally there should be funcationality to "move" this unwanted contents into a section on the server that only a person with a login on the machine can access. Should be configurable and enabled by default. (IMO this is a discussion best taken on -devel@. :)) Best, Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Roundup-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJQTuWBAAoJEDxD9Mjv9dQqR2sH/jYZVeHIlqHWM8p9TjmbrFJ8 hiFpvXGYmj27PGeQjvJZsdEdRUDLtgBRb69+gzA8g866QRR1UOB0uZraw3Zkq113 w7M2n2e6pJW/SOC1lcwMMUxpjEqJwhoqkbmsLvzyivHCYb5eqUReVut+kcy6Ug2Z HZ0TGl+DUkNcJ02bEOEkX/JOhLUl0M1YnVAsoc7O67vnQz9BN52qHAhLv3oU7gax 0pbkfcvfnrU8EcpP2LHFd+GB84ny9QS4R4jENsSawhkqq0AAMFy07VXTRC2/t9n6 p82wBFR9oGsqfJ+cb8iczr/gaQsS8xdmMwRAl1TvveL6T5oJsgXdt/G1PnRUYt8= =HXdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----