Re: nosylist/assignedto per subject
Anthony Pankov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Tom. tracker_admin, as i see, is simplifying use of roundup-tracker from outside. If you suppose it in [email protected] (or at http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/) may be somebody of developers can review it. But the community is not so responsive as somebody may expect. > Anthony, > I have to agree that making the assignedto field into a multilink > is not recommended. I needed to do that with two of our trackers. I > ended up creating a new field, assignedto_multi. The activities were: > * Change all of the code references to assignedto to properly reference assignedto_multi. > * Copy the assignedto values for all issues to assignedto_multi. > * Modify user-defined queries that refer to assignedto. > I had previously written an API for roundup_admin that helped with > this. The assignedto -> assignedto_mutli part is: > import tracker_admin > tracker = 'it' > def main(): > admin = tracker_admin.Admin('/var/www/html/' + tracker) > for (id,assignedto) in admin.find_props('issue', ['id', 'assignedto'], order='id'): > if assignedto: > admin.set('issue', id, assignedto_multi=assignedto) > admin.close() > if __name__ == '__main__': > main() > A side effect was that the activity field changed. One user > complained about that. The find_props method has no corresponding > roundup-admin command. It's like 'list' with more than one property. > The code to change user-defined queries was similar. > So, it is not recommended, but is possible. If anyone wants the tracker_admin code, just ask. > Tom Ekberg > Senior Computer Specialist, Lab Medicine > University of Washington Medical Center > 1959 NE Pacific St, MS 357110 > Seattle WA 98195 > work: (206) 598-8544 > email: [email protected] > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Anthony Pankov wrote: >> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:22:00 +0300 >> From: Anthony Pankov <[email protected]> >> To: Martin Thomas Swaton <[email protected]> >> Cc: Roundup Users <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Roundup-users] nosylist/assignedto per subject >> >> Hello, Martin. >> >>> Can more than one user be assigned to an issue, or is this just a single >>> value field? >> It depends on your schema. >> >> Default is: >> issue = IssueClass(db, "issue", >> ---> assignedto=Link("user"), <---- >> keyword=Multilink("keyword"), >> priority=Link("priority"), >> status=Link("status")) >> >> This mean single value field. If you want multiple values you need >> Multilink("user"). I don't suggest you to replace 'assignedto' type >> because default template/extension/detectors expect it singlevalued. >> >> You may add to the issue scheme field such as >> members=Multilink("user"), >> and than treat it by your own. >> >> >> >>> Thank you Anthony, >>> awesome, I will try that and extend it to our needs. >>> And if I want to assign someone would I just do something like: >>> newvalues['assignedto'] = 'user1' >>> Can more than one user be assigned to an issue, or is this just a single >>> value field? >>> Thanks for your quick help! >>> Am 17.06.2015 17:27, schrieb Anthony Pankov: >>> I think you can modify detectors/nosyreactions.py (or rename it to >>> mynosy.py). >>> Modification can be made just in 'updatenosy' function or in your >>> own function. If you create your own auditor function 'mynosy' you >>> have to replace strings in 'init': >>> from >>> db.issue.audit('create', updatenosy) >>> to >>> db.issue.audit('create', updatenosy, priority=10) >>> db.issue.audit('create', mynosy, priority=20) >>> Your function >>> def mynosy(db, cl, nodeid, newvalues): >>> # in case of creation title properties (subject) is in newvalues dict >>> if newvalues['title'] == 'important thing' : >>> nosy = newvalues.get('nosy', []) >>> ... >>> nosy.append('user2') >>> .. >>> newvalues['nosy'] = nosy >>> P.S. Code and solution above is unproven. >>> Hi roundup'lers, >>> I am quite new to roundup and need your help. >>> I would like to inform specific users or groups of users about new >>> issues based on the subject of the issue. >>> I guess this should be possible via a detector or/and a reactor. >>> But I am not familiar with writing such a script and have no idea >>> how to make sure, that this script is executed priour to the nosy >>> notification. >>> as an example: >>> a new mail issue is submitted with the subject "mail issue" >>> I want to notify "user a, user b and user c" about issues that are =~ >>> /mail/i >>> and want to assign "user a" to an issue that =~ /important mail/i >>> Can anybody show me how to realice this? >>> From my understanding of the detectors (compared to the nosy >>> detector) this should only be a few lines to >>> * define the nosy group for each tag in a dict1 >>> * define assignees per tag dict2 >>> * create nosy members from the defined dict1 >>> * create assignedto users from the other dict2 >>> and everything else should be done from the normal nosy detector >>> if this is called after this one. >>> hope this is possible and someone can help me. >>> best regards, >>> Martin >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Anthony mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Roundup-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-users >> -- Best regards, Anthony mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------