Re: Removing support for generating XHTML in roundup templates
Peter Funk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20191028161526.GA4859@pfmaster-P170EM> |
Hello roundup users, Hallo Thomas, I want to thank Thomas for taking the time to look this up in detail: Thomas Arendsen Hein schrieb am Montag, den 28.10.2019 um 16:35: > * Peter Funk <[email protected]> [20191026 12:37]: > > This feature was added at some time in the past because obviously > > someone saw the need for XHTML. It is probably difficult to find > > out who this was and whether they stopped using XHTML by now. > > changeset: 1952:c40ed9113285 > user: Richard Jones <[email protected]> > date: Sat Dec 06 00:00:54 2003 +0000 > summary: Applied Stefan Seefeld's html4/xhtml patch with some changes. > > And the corresponding change of CHANGES.txt contains: > - HTML generated is now HTML4 (or optionally XHTML) compliant (sf feature > 814314 and sf patch 834620) > > The corresponding tracker entry is: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402788&aid=814314&group_id=31577 > but SourceForge is currently half-down due to a DoS attack, so > reading this isn't easy. > > From what I have seen in the mailing list archive, the feature > request was to make Roundup pages comply to standards for HTML4 and > XHTML (because were common back then), so that the w3c checker > wouldn't complain. It was decided to only fully implement HTML4, so > only one set of templates has to be maintained, but the code to > allow switching between HTML4 and XHTML was already written. > > So there never has been an template for XHTML included in Roundup, > the only chance someone has such a template would be to create your > own. And if you create your own template, you would always have to > update it for new Roundup versions as they are almost guaranteed to > break during updates. > > -> Nobody should use XHTML templates with Roundup, and I really > doubt that there are any existing XHTML templates for Roundup. ... > > Keeping backward compatibility to older versions of a product is a > > precious value in itself to enhance the popularity of a product. > > But bogging down the development of a product won't help with the > popularity. ... I this particular case I agree: We should drop XHTML in Roundup. Best regards or (in german) Liebe Grüße, Peter Funk -- Peter Funk ✉home:Oldenburger Str.86, D-27777 Ganderkesee; 📱:+49-179-640-8878 ✉office: ArtCom GmbH, Haferwende 2, D-28357 Bremen, Germany ☎office:+49-421-20419-0 <http://www.artcom-gmbh.de/> _______________________________________________ Roundup-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 173 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFdtxQey0klgkNpN0IRAhBnAKCAGYPtGzjoKfQsv/IJnkgkLJumlQCfbX7e mYWFzI08UHypLSvAeifwaXw= =NVdi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----