Re: [Bug?] Filtering on property=-1 and ordering by the same property at the same time

Nagy Gabor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user
Message-ID <20210512193731.192e434d@Dell>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:30:10PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > Dear Roundup users,
> > 
> > I found a strange behaviour in my roundup tracker. I am not sure if
> > this is a bug (it was mentioned in this ML, that filtering has some
> > tricky options with negative numbers). If it is a bug, I will report
> > this in the bug tracker too.
> > 
> > Symptom:
> > 
> > http://localhost:8080/tracker/issue?@filter=status&status=-1,2
> > 
> > lists all issues with status -1 (unset) or 2 (deferred).
> > 
> > However, in the list of
> > 
> > http://localhost:8080/tracker/issue?@filter=status&status=-1,2&@sort=status
> > 
> > issues with status -1 are missing.  
> 
> Can you retry without sorting?
> As far as I know, for Link properties (like status) you cannot combine
> -1 with other IDs, so you can either search for -1 alone or for
> several IDs but not the combination. Should not make a difference if
> you're sorting on the same property or not.
> 
> Note that the same thing should (since some patches over the weekend
> :-) work reliably for multilink properties.
> 
> And, yes, it would be desirable to have the same mechanisms for Link
> and Multilink props ...
> 
> Ralf

Dear Ralf,

Thanks, but it seems that "filter=-1,2" etc. works as expected without
sorting, e.g. in my first example. It looks also OK if you sort by a
property different from status (the property that contains a -1
filter), e.g. "filter=status&status=-1,2&@sort=id"
Do you say that a filter like status=-1,2 has unpredictable result?
Which patch do you refer to?

My reply to your other email: OK, I will not sort anything by a
multilink property. :)

Regards,
Gábor


_______________________________________________
Roundup-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roundup-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.