Re: Roundup rest API
SCHLEMMER Norbert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Using the DELETE command and having ADMIN role assigned makes it working well. The "deleted" issue will be set to retire and is excluded from search Thanks Norbert -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2023 15:23 An: SCHLEMMER Norbert <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: [Roundup-users] Roundup rest API *EXTERNAL source* In message <[email protected]>, SCHLEMMER Norbert writes: >Hello John > >Want to add the "delete / remove" issue function, but how ? > >The #patch command with "@op=remove" will be executed with return code >"200 OK" Just a note, using the DELETE verb will do the same and is arguably easier to use. @op=remove was added to match @op=restore since there is no HTTP verb that matches the restore function. >but the issue is still visible and part of the search result The issue will be retreivable if you use its full rest path .../rest/data/issue/23 for example. There have been discussions about returning a 404 or hiding a retired item. But we haven't had any concrete ideas on impementing it. This can be a problem for users and GDPR. https://wiki.roundup-tracker.org/RemovingUsers may be helpful. It should not be listed in an index view. E.G. .../rest/data/issue should not show the retired issue. What type of search are you doing, what URL? Also what roles does the searching user have? Have a great day. -- -- rouilj John Rouillard =========================================================================== My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.