Re: Docker experimental multi-arch image build (arm64, i386, amd64)

"John P. Rouillard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Norbert:

In message <DU2PR01MB8557698E358F8F776984B782E8CEA@DU2PR01MB8557.eurprd01.prod.
exchangelabs.com>,
SCHLEMMER Norbert writes:
>.) docker inspect <image id>
>
>"Architecture": "arm64",
>
>"Os": "linux",
>
>-> seems to be ok
>
> docker run -it -e SHELL_DEBUG=1 -p 127.0.0.1:8917:8080 --name \
>   roundup_demo -v $PWD:/usr/src/app/tracker \
>   rounduptracker/roundup-development:multi shell
>
>
>
>-> image started, logs below

Logs look fine.


>Which file are needed at $PWD ?
[...]
>
>+ '[' true '=' false ]
>
>+ exec /bin/sh

Normal startup and you had a shell. So it looks like it's a good image
at least.

>~ $ ls -lrt
>
>total 16
>
>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root           291 Jul 19 03:12 roundup_healthcheck
>
>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root          5711 Sep  8 02:08 roundup_start
>
>drwxr-xr-x    2 roundup  roundup       4096 Oct  9 14:58 tracker

That's exactly what I expected. If the tracker directory is empty, can
you cd to that directory and run roundup-demo using demo as the
directory.

See if it throws any errors. If that works, using the same docker
command to run demo rather than shell and see what verbose output reports.

Oh one other question, is your userid on the pi 1000? The docker
container runs as uid 1000. I would expect it to complain somewhere
your could see it, but maybe it just went to the bitbucket on your
first failed attempt.

Have a great day.

--
				-- rouilj
John Rouillard
===========================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.