Re: Outreach via wikipedia articles on authentication and authorization
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABHxS9iaqbKFHf=hrB0sT4jb5JGpJzHOM=srQR3zwujwV132rQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Karp, Alan H <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob Meijer wrote: > > > transferring accountability with delegation without actually unduly > > delegating knowledge about identity, that IMO would be absolutely > amazing. > > Does this make sense? > > I think it does indeed make sense, and I believe you can do it with > Horton. Each user is identified by an object that encapsulates a Be and a > Who. The Be is an sealer-unsealer equivalent of a private key; a Who, that > of a public key. The Horton paper assumed that the Who allowed anyone with > a reference to it to be able to determine who (pun intended) it was for. > There is nothing to say that there can't be a facet of the Who object that > can obscure that identity information. > So that Horton Hears an Almost Who? > > ________________________ > Alan Karp > Principal Scientist > Enterprise Services, Office of the CTO > Hewlett-Packard Company > 1501 Page Mill Road > Palo Alto, CA 94304 > (650) 857-3967, fax (650) 857-7029 > http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Alan_Karp > > > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk > -- Cheers, --MarkM _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk