Re: Fwd: seL4 is going open source

"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <CAAP=3QOOSaezdNggOTZQtvP81ULGKUwGZVoT4pe9SK_8giiAtg@mail.gmail.com>
I'm pleased to see the open source announcement for seL4, but I have mixed
feelings about it. I think it's worth noting that:

1. OKL4 actually *was* open source until OKLabs took it proprietary. That
doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy.
2. So far as I know, seL4 isn't a kernel that is actually shipping.

Regardless, I'm delighted to be able to openly examine how NICTA/OKLabs
approached the formalization and verification process. I'll be interested
to see if the formalization errors that we have identified in some prior
work have been addressed. Given the reticence with which the group has
reacted to questions and issues raised by Scott Doerrie and myself, it will
be good to be able to carefully examine and review the work. No proof is
perfect. The ability to explore their approach in depth is *very* valuable.


Jonathan

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.