Re: A practical and compelling distributed cap platform: Sandstorm on Cap'n Proto

"Rob Meijer" <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, August 5, 2014 11:50, Kenton Varda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As a regular Xen host, you should be able to run any normal Linux
>> guest alongside the unikernels.
>
>
> Yes. Of course, that's considerably heavier than a Linux container.
>
>
>> Presumably, sandstorm could itself be
>> one of the guest VMs.
>>
>
> Indeed.
>
> In the long run, I hope that people will start writing Sandstorm apps in
> an
> object-capability language, at which point the need for Linux containers
> for sandboxing goes away and multiple users can even be served from the
> same process, making things even more efficient.

Hmm, why not go for a layered defence? The TCB for ocap language runtimes
is still uncomfortably large IMO.

> At that point it may make
> a lot of sense to further transition to running more directly on top of
> Nymote, getting rid of the legacy Linux kernel entirely.
>
> It's a long road, though.
>
> -Kenton
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.