Re: Fwd: Re: [Cryptography] Encryption opinion
David Barbour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAOQMSsdsgWEpy8QA8QW_85sQ_h9ctXjc7nAfbmoANKQp=Sv8w@mail.gmail.com> |
I think this is an important point. It's also being studied, e.g. look into Ka-Ping Yee's paper on Secure Interaction Design, and the Usable Security website. I think code-as-media works better if we trade most 'objects' for pure functional closures and immutable values. That way, media can be composed and communicated even at runtime. This is useful for a more open and extensible world. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > we *propose* a world where, by the power of ocaps, third-party code is > merely a new form of media; something that is shared freely and embedded in > all sorts of places. I claim that this, more than anything else, is the > power of ocaps -- to make the world safe for objects! But if indeed that is > our goal, then how do we represent -- and *pre*sent to the user -- the > complex security scenarios that result? > > _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk