Re: Fwd: Re: [Cryptography] Encryption opinion

David Barbour <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <CAAOQMSsdsgWEpy8QA8QW_85sQ_h9ctXjc7nAfbmoANKQp=Sv8w@mail.gmail.com>
I think this is an important point. It's also being studied, e.g. look into
Ka-Ping Yee's paper on Secure Interaction Design, and the Usable Security
website.

I think code-as-media works better if we trade most 'objects' for pure
functional closures and immutable values. That way, media can be composed
and communicated even at runtime. This is useful for a more open and
extensible world.

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> we *propose* a world where, by the power of ocaps, third-party code is
> merely a new form of media; something that is shared freely and embedded in
> all sorts of places. I claim that this, more than anything else, is the
> power of ocaps -- to make the world safe for objects! But if indeed that is
> our goal, then how do we represent -- and *pre*sent to the user -- the
> complex security scenarios that result?
>
>

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.