Re: [friam] "Ambient capabilities"
Tony Arcieri <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHOTMVJZ5ZN2EVUb7vfLAAM4dGquo_WLbyMO7cBGRCf9Ks=RTg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Mike Stay <[email protected]> wrote: > Then as far as I can tell, this is plain old broken ambient authority, > and has nothing to do with capabilities. I'm curious what you think about a system like Sandstorm, where each object and the associated authority is contained in a YURL-like identifier, but the permissions that YURL confers are passed through to the backend application in an ambient way (i.e. X-Sandstorm-Permissions) -- Tony Arcieri _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk