Re: Programmatic and security models for IoT
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2015 22:49:32 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r422Ps-1075i-237830D8B88C49549E9286DB58B3AE7B@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local> |
On 2/4/15 at 9:29 PM, [email protected] (Dan Connolly) wrote: >SES (Secure EcmaScript) seems more promising, to me. Note that Mark Miller was a major mover in both E and SES. If you haven't read his PHD thesis <http://www.erights.org/talks/thesis/markm-thesis.pdf>, you probably should. I'm not a Javascript guy, but moving in that direction seems reasonable. One advantage of E is that there are fewer compromises with the legacy. Javascript needs to avoid breaking the web as it moves to become a capability platform. If you think in E, you won't be seduced by the parts of Javascript that hang around for backward compatibility. Cheers - Bill ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Concurrency is hard. 12 out | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, CA 95032