Re: Programmatic and security models for IoT

Bill Frantz <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2015 22:49:32 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <r422Ps-1075i-237830D8B88C49549E9286DB58B3AE7B@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
On 2/4/15 at 9:29 PM, [email protected] (Dan Connolly) wrote:

>SES (Secure EcmaScript) seems more promising, to me.

Note that Mark Miller was a major mover in both E and SES. If 
you haven't read his PHD thesis 
<http://www.erights.org/talks/thesis/markm-thesis.pdf>, you 
probably should.

I'm not a Javascript guy, but moving in that direction seems 
reasonable. One advantage of E is that there are fewer 
compromises with the legacy. Javascript needs to avoid breaking 
the web as it moves to become a capability platform. If you 
think in E, you won't be seduced by the parts of Javascript that 
hang around for backward compatibility.

Cheers - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Concurrency is hard. 12 out  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com |                - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032