Re: Fwd: [friam] Could you/somebody make a safe browser?
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:04:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD2Yivap6a9=vT297yW6UEJ1eO0cMdF392jf+hHgWH_WzrHUVw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > This is why I really like the work that Mozilla is doing with their new Servo rendering engine, written in Rust, a memory-safe language ... I agree Servo is a step in the right direction, but (1) the Rust stdlib has plenty of ambient authority. In 2012, I started doing an audit, but I haven't managed to put enough time into it to make a real contribution. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/3094#issuecomment-9589749 Discipline around explicit authority seems just as important as memory-safety. After all, PHP is memory-safe too. (2) while one secure browser would be nifty, "insecurity anywhere is a threat to security everywhere". As long as the bad guys can own millions of machines, it's pretty hard to deploy services to a broad audience with any confidence. -- Dan Connolly http://www.madmode.com/