Re: should ses work with current Chrome? error from contract.html

"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:20:17 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.capabilities.general
Message-ID <CABHxS9g=Mc5nr6CR0p=j-yVjASkbYMTsAxMHwk1mkJXj-hTruA@mail.gmail.com>
[+google-caja-discuss] // please subscribe so your responses appear there
as well.


Hi Dan, are you seeing this on visiting
http://es-lab.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/ses/contract.html ?



On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Dan Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:

> I get: contract test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was
> called on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function
>
>
>
> a bit more context:
>
> $ svn info
> URL: http://es-lab.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/ses
> Repository UUID: aeea10e6-ec39-11de-83d8-6d5adf01d787
> Revision: 907
> Last Changed Date: 2015-02-15 10:49:54 -0600 (Sun, 15 Feb 2015)
>
>
> The full text of the page is:
>
> Repair Reports
>
> [+] 2 Fine.
>
> [+] 111 Fine.
>
> [+] 9) Repaired: Non-deletable RegExp statics are a global
> communication channel.
>
> [+] 14) Repaired: Date.prototype is a global communication channel.
>
> [+] 16) Not repaired: Number.prototype should be a plain object. Safe
> spec violation(1).
>
> [+] 17) Not repaired: Boolean.prototype should be a plain object. Safe
> spec violation(1).
>
> [+] 18) Not repaired: String.prototype should be a plain object. Safe
> spec violation(1).
>
> [+] 19) Not repaired: RegExp.prototype should be a plain object. Safe
> spec violation(1).
>
> [+] 70) Not repaired: [[ThrowTypeError]] has normal function
> properties. Safe spec violation(1).
>
> Max Severity: Safe spec violation(1).
>
> [+] 3 Fine.
>
> [+] 598 Apparently fine.
>
> [+] 75 Deleted.
>
> [+] 3 Frozen harmless.
>
> [+] 1 Skipped. Safe spec violation(1).
>
> ________________________________
>
> initSES succeeded.
>
> Expected error to test ses.getStack API: [+]Error: Expand me to see stack
>
> Testing ses.getStack with compileExprLater: [+]Error: Expand me to see
> stack
>
> exprTest...succeeded
> moduleTest...succeeded
> scriptTest...succeeded
> AMD loader test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was
> called on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function
> contract test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was called
> on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function
>
> Using Chrome 41.0.2272.89 on Linux
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly
> http://www.madmode.com/
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM

_______________________________________________
cap-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk