Re: should ses work with current Chrome? error from contract.html
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:20:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABHxS9g=Mc5nr6CR0p=j-yVjASkbYMTsAxMHwk1mkJXj-hTruA@mail.gmail.com> |
[+google-caja-discuss] // please subscribe so your responses appear there as well. Hi Dan, are you seeing this on visiting http://es-lab.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/ses/contract.html ? On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Dan Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > I get: contract test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was > called on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function > > > > a bit more context: > > $ svn info > URL: http://es-lab.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/ses > Repository UUID: aeea10e6-ec39-11de-83d8-6d5adf01d787 > Revision: 907 > Last Changed Date: 2015-02-15 10:49:54 -0600 (Sun, 15 Feb 2015) > > > The full text of the page is: > > Repair Reports > > [+] 2 Fine. > > [+] 111 Fine. > > [+] 9) Repaired: Non-deletable RegExp statics are a global > communication channel. > > [+] 14) Repaired: Date.prototype is a global communication channel. > > [+] 16) Not repaired: Number.prototype should be a plain object. Safe > spec violation(1). > > [+] 17) Not repaired: Boolean.prototype should be a plain object. Safe > spec violation(1). > > [+] 18) Not repaired: String.prototype should be a plain object. Safe > spec violation(1). > > [+] 19) Not repaired: RegExp.prototype should be a plain object. Safe > spec violation(1). > > [+] 70) Not repaired: [[ThrowTypeError]] has normal function > properties. Safe spec violation(1). > > Max Severity: Safe spec violation(1). > > [+] 3 Fine. > > [+] 598 Apparently fine. > > [+] 75 Deleted. > > [+] 3 Frozen harmless. > > [+] 1 Skipped. Safe spec violation(1). > > ________________________________ > > initSES succeeded. > > Expected error to test ses.getStack API: [+]Error: Expand me to see stack > > Testing ses.getStack with compileExprLater: [+]Error: Expand me to see > stack > > exprTest...succeeded > moduleTest...succeeded > scriptTest...succeeded > AMD loader test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was > called on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function > contract test...failed: TypeError: Function.prototype.apply was called > on undefined, which is a undefined and not a function > > Using Chrome 41.0.2272.89 on Linux > > > > > -- > Dan Connolly > http://www.madmode.com/ > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk > -- Cheers, --MarkM _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk