Re: sudo
Ben Kloosterman <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Apr 2015 07:45:45 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJT18iYLUqNrhTffH1O5T_2JZ+o9A1TOqi_3CEOnFx8B7jqdxw@mail.gmail.com> |
chown / chmod for me as well . Windows 8 running windows apps and no win32 apps is close... Android has some features.. So there is movement in this direction from the private sector. Plenty of movement in terms of "device owner" granting capabilities , UIs granting them and removing ambient authority ( more by going to shared nothing) but not much in terms of sharing capabilities to access shared servers/ services. I don't expect to see a main stream ocap Unix unless FreeBsd which uses capsicum gets up. Too hard for apps/opensource to make the revolutionary change in API needed. With regard to how hard it is to change Apis it is worth watching Microsoft efforts here with WindowsRT ( Modern now Windows apps) vs Win32 and the difficulty of ocaps for service apps as opposed to Gui apps. The main efforts so far ( while still requiring apps to be rewritten) do not create a fundamental conceptual shift , but shared services sharing caps do require it and i have seen nothing here. There was a big event at Stanford https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/foreign-policy/cybersecurity/summit with no mention in the agenda of capabilities. Though fido authentication looks interesting if the standard gets up https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/overview/ . Ben On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Where's our main-stream ocap OS. :-( > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk > _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk