Re: Pony talks about Deny Capabilities
David Nicol <[email protected]> Mon, 4 May 2015 12:36:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFwScO8SZt_QwV-gVLWkToU_bz-TWP=C5wegzV-bf+R9=9ZrXQ@mail.gmail.com> |
my takeaway from scanning this was that race-free message passing could be securely implemented with immutables by creating the immutable and then passing to the recipient a read-cap that verifies that it is being executed by the recipient. This presumes an identity schema of some kind, between processes on one machine PID would be adequate; in a cloud environment something slightly more complicated but equally basic. Identifying all actors by public key and messaging to one in particular by general publication of encrypted messages (and somehow alerting the recipient of the publication) would work but could be overkill. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > http://ponylang.org/papers/fast-cheap.pdf > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk -- Case law is made by litigants questioning Judges' decisions.