Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Mark Miller <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:45:19 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK5yZYjw8kx1+v95zqU1Xo1e=o8WiLhx8vR7hPL=_0k=MMUdFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am not aware of any work done currently that uses capabilities in the > >> calling conventions in programming languages. > > > You can't call a method on something if you don't have it. So in a > lame way, is not standard OOP already ocapy vis-a-vie method calling? > If we're talking about memory safe languages, why lame? > > Of course, then you have to figure out who can *make* things since > ambient ability to new things up is not so good. > If creation does not violate the connectivity laws nor cause external effects, what's the problem? -- Cheers, --MarkM _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk