Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Tim Coote <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:42:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You may be surprised at the configuration variation in the wild. A specific vulnerability may be the result of combinations of components. As an example from the enterprise space. A measurement of the deployments of jvms on servers in a major bank showed a mean of 6 versions per server for those computers that had java installed (which was most of them, iirc). Since the variation is not normally measured, it’s not likely to be well controlled. > On 12 Oct 2015, at 01:46, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies for the immediately preceding fat fingered message send :-( > >> Only if you are already vulnerable. The vulnerability in my sqrt function >> does not itself make you vulnerable, even if it does exploit a vulnerability >> you already have. > > That sounds more safe than I think things are in the real world? I > expect if there's a vulnerability, a lot of people will have it; we > don't all run /that/ many different OSs, I'd guess. > _______________________________________________ > cap-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk