Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:40:01 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r422Ps-10112i-83D983AC4E764B04BE15FDF8014106C0@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local> |
On 1/5/16 at 2:08 PM, [email protected] (Alan Karp) wrote: >On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Mike Stay <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>Google's UI researchers claimed to us that people would get a >>read-only view from somewhere and then be confused when they couldn't >>edit it, even when there was an edit button. People don't look for >>controls they don't expect to need. >> > >I think they are too pessimistic. You can set up things so that a Word >document is read-only when opened from an email attachment. The header >says it's read only, and you get the option to save a copy when you try to >edit. There's a momentary jolt when you try to edit, but I bet few people >are confused for very long. Many Mac applications put documents into read-only mode after a number of days of no changes. When you try to change them, they pop up a dialog asking if you want a r/w version. It really isn't confusing. Cheers - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Re: Computer reliability, performance, and security: 408-356-8506 | The guy who *is* wearing a parachute is *not* the www.pwpconsult.com | first to reach the ground. - Terence Kelly