Re: Access control for IoT
Ben Kloosterman <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:11:57 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.capabilities.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJT18ibHt6sRxdUi7pJyHwcER89k1FHeD_eWJ5kK6KODok0Vkw@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============8526166439970180174== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e4b4ea802080529a5908b --047d7b2e4b4ea802080529a5908b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Valerio Bellizzomi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I've seen software update is a process that needs the device powered off >> and on some devices the reflashing is via usb cable. >> > > I consider automatic software updates a baseline requirement for a secure > system. If the device needs to be connected to some sort of tether cable > and flashed by some 3rd party software utility the user needs to install, > those upgrades aren't going to happen. > > Not practical / wise for HW / small ioc . Yet to see a single mother board auto update - with good reason . HW normally works on no changes and if there are any changes there is normally a very length cycle before its released. This includes Flash /EEproms , not to mention that it some cases you can brick the device with some Eeproms if you do it to often. Ben --047d7b2e4b4ea802080529a5908b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Tony Arcieri <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a = href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&g= t;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0= .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div cl= ass=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><span class=3D"">On Mon, Jan= 18, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Valerio Bellizzomi <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"= mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></sp= an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px= 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left= -style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34)= ">I've seen software update is a process that needs the device powered = off</span><br></div></div> and on some devices the reflashing is via usb cable.<br></blockquote><div><= br></div></span><div class=3D"gmail_quote">I consider automatic software up= dates a baseline requirement for a secure system. If the device needs to be= connected to some sort of tether cable and flashed by some 3rd party softw= are utility the user needs to install, those upgrades aren't going to h= appen.</div><span class=3D""><div>=C2=A0</div></span></div></div></div></bl= ockquote><div><br></div><div>Not practical / wise for HW / small =C2=A0ioc = .=C2=A0 Yet to see a single mother board auto update - with good reason . H= W normally works on no changes =C2=A0and if there are any changes there is = normally a very length cycle before its released. This includes Flash /EEpr= oms =C2=A0, not to mention that it some cases you can brick the device with= some Eeproms if you do =C2=A0it to often.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>B= en</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div> --047d7b2e4b4ea802080529a5908b-- --===============8526166439970180174== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ cap-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk --===============8526166439970180174==--