Re: Re: [Bx-bugs] [Bug 899] doctypes

Hi

I have to check that in a calm minute, which I won't find today, just
one answer:

> in bxcmsadm action, parameter xslt is reset using
getStylesheetNameByRequest()
> In what circumstances in admin action there could be needed xslt
> from plugin rather then from .configxml ?

For example in bx_editors_blog.

chregu




On 13.2.2006 13:08 Uhr, qMax wrote:
> Sunday, January 29, 2006, 6:38:07 PM, Christian Stocker wrote:
> CS> Hi again
> CS> I had some idea, about the getStylesheetNameByRequest method.
> CS> Why not add another method like
> $collection->>getPipelineParametersByRequest($filename,$ext)
> CS> and the plugins can return a whole array of pipeline parameters, the
> CS> xmldoc would then
> CS> return array("stylesheet" => "mystylesheet.xsl");
> CS> and the bxcms action puts them into the pipeline.
> CS> This would make it more flexible to add any parameter to the pipeline
> CS> and not just one called "stylesheet".
> 
> And yet another question.
> 3.
> in bxcms action, there supposed, that 'xslt' must be set using getPipelineProperties()
> (configured in .configxml), otherwise an exception raised.
> 
> in bxcmsadm action, parameter xslt is reset using getStylesheetNameByRequest()
> 
> In what circumstances in admin action there could be needed xslt
> from plugin rather then from .configxml ?
> 

-- 
christian stocker | Bitflux GmbH | schoeneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich
phone +41 44 240 56 70 | mobile +41 76 561 88 60 | fax +41 1 240 56 71
http://www.bitflux.ch | [email protected] |  GPG 0x5CE1DECB
-- 
bitflux-cms mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bitflux-cms