Re: "Flux CMS"?

Simon Rönnqvist <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:32:43 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.cms.bitflux.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

   Hi!

IMHO there's nothing badly wrong with Flux CMS, but I would actually  
rather have stuck to Bitflux CMS and for simplicity just dropped  
BxCMS. Bitflux CMS isn't too long and complicated, and would cause  
less confusion. Especially the Bitflux editor is already rather well  
known, so why not stick with the name Bitflux?

   cheers, Simon

On Jul 11, 2005, at 07:35, Christian Stocker wrote:

> As we didn't really announce Flux CMS yet, there's still your  
> chance to
> say "no way, that name is just bad" and we will think about it.
>

-- 
bitflux-cms mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bitflux-cms