Re: "Flux CMS"?
Christian Stocker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.bitflux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19.7.2005 10:32 Uhr, Simon Rönnqvist wrote: > Hi! > > IMHO there's nothing badly wrong with Flux CMS, but I would actually > rather have stuck to Bitflux CMS and for simplicity just dropped BxCMS. > Bitflux CMS isn't too long and complicated, and would cause less > confusion. Especially the Bitflux editor is already rather well known, > so why not stick with the name Bitflux? Because... :) Lot of reasons, but basically as Flux CMS is an open source project and not only the software of the company Bitflux (even if it looks like that currently), we wanted to have a difference between those. Even if it's 3 letters :) chregu > > cheers, Simon > > > On Jul 11, 2005, at 07:35, Christian Stocker wrote: > > >> As we didn't really announce Flux CMS yet, there's still your chance to >> say "no way, that name is just bad" and we will think about it. >> > -- christian stocker | Bitflux GmbH | schoeneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich phone +41 1 240 56 70 | mobile +41 76 561 88 60 | fax +41 1 240 56 71 http://www.bitflux.ch | [email protected] | gnupg-keyid 0x5CE1DECB -- bitflux-cms mailing list [email protected] http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bitflux-cms