Re: Benifits of ASP CMS Hosted
Michael Yacavone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r02010100-1033-73059F4CA59911D881B1000A959A16EE@[172.16.1.18]> |
>> Any decent "remote-publish" CMS is going to have incremental page >> updating. Sure, you may occasionally need to "re-generate" the >> entire site, but that's not the everyday operation. > OpenCMS (at OpenCMS.org) is a damned good CMS, and it does _not_ > have this feature, "incremental page updating." Furthermore, I do > not think that Bricolage or Plone has this feature, though I am > less certain of this claim because I do not those CMS's as well as > I know OpenCMS. Might be a good reason to look at some commercial products, where it is considered a low-end feature. > I can probably answer the question for Plone if somebody tells me > what a "remote-publish CMS" is and what the heck "incremental page > updating" is, and why you would want it. :-) In the context of Mr. Bain's argument, "remote-publish" simply means the CMS ftp's or sftp's the static html files to another server for web hosting. "Incremental page updating" just means that you can publish one page (or group of pages) at a time, rather than pushing the whole site out for minor page updates. You would want these two features because separating the data-management system (with it's many moving parts) and the web page delivery system will scale better and much cheaper. And as a site grows, you don't want to ftp a whole site with thousands of pages just because someone fixed a typo somewhere.