RE: [CMS-PR] : Hello, french guy from France..
Dominic Cronin <Dominic.Cronin-g7/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <65461C1A6FEE3A45814FA70665901DD69F756C@NL1EXCH01> |
-----Original Message----- From: Lennart Regebro [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14 June 2004 13:35 To: Dominic Cronin; [email protected] Subject: Re: [CMS] [CMS-PR] : Hello, french guy from France.. From: "Dominic Cronin" <Dominic.Cronin-g7/[email protected]> > [Dominic Cronin] They don't seem to have any examples of non-open-source, > open-standards-compliant software. Well, they say that they want both open source and open standards. Then listing software that does not comply to both seems pointless. [Dominic Cronin] If you remember, my original point was that this site blurs the distinction between these two fundamentally different concepts. You contradicted me, and now you are providing a very nice example of my point. The goal of using open source software and the goal of using open standards are very different. Effectively they only overlap by co-incidence. Now you're saying that, of course, a site that promotes both wouldn't be interested in anything but the intersection of the two! In any case, I dont agree. Most software listed is open source, but does not comply to many standards at all. An of course, most open source software uses open standards. Why would the not? [Dominic Cronin] [Dominic Cronin] So does "most open source software": a) not comply to many standards at all or b) use open standards?