RE: Accessibility

cms-list wrote:
> Does that sound like a bad idea:
> 
> To optimize the user experience for both sets of users, we're
> thinking of 
> having a separate url (like accessible.company.com) which would
> basically be 
> the print-only version of the site, plus some form of navigation.

A well planned, well structured site shouldn't require separate versions.
Accessibility improves the user experience for all...just not those that
rely on assistive technology.

Granted, a lot of commercial CMS will tought the 'incredible' ability to
plaster a flash animation on a page over thoughtful consideration of
usability and accessibility issues in their product.

-Darrel