Re: Re: DHTML browsers [was Accessibility]
Robert Koberg <rob-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam Fields wrote: >It depends. XML is great for hierarchical structuring, but unless >you've also got a good XML object store, it's generally terrible for >querying or editing partial documents. > I don't agree. We use Jakarta's Lucene to index our XML content and configuration (running the XML through a SAX ContentHandler). You can index at a very fine and make complex queries. And it is fast. Here is a quick tutorial on how you do it. It is for java but it is easy enough for most developers to understand the concepts of XML indexing: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-lucene/ best, -Rob >That is to say - it's a good >part of an answer, but it's not the whole answer. > >I find that XML is useful as an interchange format, but generally not >great for storage. > >