Re: the difference between WCM,ECM,LCM,MCM
"joseph martins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008201c410e3$ff708000$43b2a78e@JosephMartins> |
> At 05:38 PM 23/03/2004, Bruce Melendy wrote: > > the problem i'm having is identifying functionality that is specific to > WCM - ie, that ECM doesn't have or doesn't typically support. >what else? i guess there are some ECM vendors already doing one >or more of these (certainly no 1). is there any other functionality unique >to WCM? is there any functionality unique to WCM at all? Hi Bruce, The net for ECM has been cast so wide that your question is essentially moot. And the net continues to widen each year. I believe there no longer exists any functionality that is truly unique to WCM (or any other *Ms for that matter). You'd be hard pressed to find a feature that I could not point out in one or more so-called ECM systems (just look at the M&A activity of the past four years). As if that isn't confusing enough to the average user, it gets worse. Humor me as I take you on a brief journey beyond the boundary of CM as you know it today. Storage technology vendors are positioning themselves to devour the content management market. Not only are the players bigger and better-funded, but they have a far better understanding of the physical storage issues (backup, recovery, migration, replication, and archiving) that underpin CM. Why target CM? Storage vendors are busy building momentum behind another buzzword concept known as Information Lifecycle Management (or ILM), one aspect of which is CM. If you haven't read about Information Lifecycle Management, hold on to your seat. ILM incorporates both content management and storage management. The idea is to optimize the cost of physically storing information assets by moving assets to the most appropriate storage devices (over time) based on changing service level requirements and usage patterns (from high-end disk arrays for subsecond access, to mid-tier near-line storage, to low-end SATA arrays, to tape libraries for archiving). I could go on and on but it's well beyond the scope of your original question. Just thought you might like a glimpse of where the industry is headed. I've begun to discuss these issues and more in a weblog (www.dmgrc.com/dmg/weblog/). May I ask, what prompted you to ask that question? Is there a bigger issue you're trying to resolve? Joe _______________________________________________ CMS mailing list [email protected] Subscription controls: http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [CMS-Forum], [CMS-Meta], [CMS-PR], [CMS-Develop] http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html