Re: Re: DHTML browsers [was Accessibility]

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:51:37 -0700, Robert Koberg wrote
>
> Adam Fields wrote:
> 
> >It depends. XML is great for hierarchical structuring, but unless
> >you've also got a good XML object store, it's generally terrible for
> >querying or editing partial documents. 
> 
> I don't agree. We use Jakarta's Lucene to index our XML content and 
> configuration (running the XML through a SAX ContentHandler). You 
> can index at a very fine and make complex queries. And it is fast.

I understand there is no equivalent of SAX for .NET, which results in
relatively high overhead and poor performance for equivalent functionality. 
Does anyone have a .NET solution for this?