Re: Re: DHTML browsers [was Accessibility]

cms-list wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:51:37 -0700, Robert Koberg wrote
>  
>
>>Adam Fields wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>It depends. XML is great for hierarchical structuring, but unless
>>>you've also got a good XML object store, it's generally terrible for
>>>querying or editing partial documents. 
>>>      
>>>
>>I don't agree. We use Jakarta's Lucene to index our XML content and 
>>configuration (running the XML through a SAX ContentHandler). You 
>>can index at a very fine and make complex queries. And it is fast.
>>    
>>
>
>I understand there is no equivalent of SAX for .NET, which results in
>relatively high overhead and poor performance for equivalent functionality. 
>Does anyone have a .NET solution for this?
>  
>

I have seen this project mentioned on the XML-DEV list:

http://saxdotnet.sourceforge.net/

SAX is definitely the way to go if speed and a small footprint is 
important. :)

best,
-Rob