Re: CMS Site Structures

"Jason Stevens" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general
Message-ID <031f01c4ffe1$64eaf220$7400a8c0@jason>
Negative! In fact, one of the things that bothers me about finding out about
Marqui in the first place is becuase the person on the list who referrred me
was a paid - albeit honest and technically informed - blogger from Marqui.

I have been looking at cms products for a year now and Marqui is the closest
I have come to meeting my needs. I am actually looking for negative feedback
to balance out my positive views thus far :)

If you have any, I would appeciate hearing them!

Thanks
Jason
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Bardeggia" <[email protected]>
To: "CMS-List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [CMS] CMS Site Structures


>
> Are you getting paid to mention their name under M--qui's "spam blogging"
> marketing promotion?
>
> Just curious.
>
> Mike Bardeggia
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jason Stevens
> Sent: January 21, 2005 11:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CMS] CMS Site Structures
>
>
> How would you compare this to Marqui.coom which offers what I think is a
> slightly different and possibly unique model(?):
>
> They appear to have a hosted CMS solution which allows you to suck in your
> pages into the admin and template system. You then configure the templates
> and can publish BACK
> to your server the html, asp or php content.  They also use situate the
> database tables on your sql server if you wish so all the data belongs to
> you.
>
> So far I have been unable to see a system that offers such a simple and
> clean web model but does nto make me a 'captive user'.
>
> Additionally, you can publish content to multiple sites and easily
'secure'
> the page.
>
> Does anyone have thoughts on this? I think it is relevant to the
discussion
> at hand and would appreciate any 'warnings' on this model.
>
> So far their pre-support has been excellent but I am not totally convinced
> their model will work as described.
>
> Jason
> www.catamarans.com
>
>
> > >
> > > I suppose at this stage I am more interested in the actual physical
> > > location of the files and functionality.  The site is ASP.Net based -
I
> > > am just trying to decide whether to go for a single installation on a
> > > single server under IIS or use one server for the public site and one
> > > for the admin tools.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cms mailing list
> [email protected]
> Subscription controls:
> http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms
> Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr],
> [contentmanagers], [cmpros]
> http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> cms mailing list
> [email protected]
> Subscription controls:
> http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms
> Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr],
[contentmanagers], [cmpros]
> http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.