RE: [Microsoft-based solution for a portal + CMSsystem]:Microsoft SharePoint portal + Microsoft CMS ?

"Jason Burton" <Jason-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.cms-forum.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel is right on this one. This rumour keeps raising its head (see
this article on CMS Watch
(http://www.cmswatch.com/AskTony/Archive/?question_id=43), but its
simply not true.

I work with MCMS a lot and I'm pretty excited about what's coming up in
the next version of CMS. The fact that next version will be more closely
aligned with SharePoint and, by virtue of that, MS Office, opens up a
lot of possibilities.

Jason 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
> forum.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Reardon
> Sent: 25 February 2005 09:54
> To: Steve Williams; Jerry Santelli; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [CMS] [Microsoft-based solution for a portal +
> CMSsystem]:Microsoft SharePoint portal + Microsoft CMS ?
> 
>  That's old news and things have since changed.  Microsoft did have an
> initiative code named Jupiter but this is no longer the case. In fact
> Jupiter ceased being an initiative at least 12 months ago .
> 
> To a certain degree Steve is right - CMS and SPS are coming together.
> Depending on whether you talk to a CMS person or an SPS person you
will
> get differing views on how the two products are coming together. That
> said if you talk to Microsoft this will become much clearer. Also in
> terms of Document Management you need to be a little careful as
Meridio
> certainly has a part to play.
> 
> We are under NDA so cannot say much more. If you want clarity I
suggest
> you contact Microsoft - this is surely preferable to speculation.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Williams [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 24 February 2005 18:41
> To: Daniel Reardon; Jerry Santelli; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [CMS] [Microsoft-based solution for a portal + CMS
> system]:Microsoft SharePoint portal + Microsoft CMS ?
> 
> ...this is interesting - because the word on the street in the UK -
one
> source being a large MS Gold Partner - is that the MS-CMS development
> team has been dissolved and merged into the Sharepoint team. If it is
> *not* true then MS need to communicate this more effectively - because
> the market perception across customers and even their own partners is
> that MS-CMS is not being developed, the team that were developing it
are
> now part of the Sharepoint team and that customers are being 'pushed'
> towards Sharepoint Portal and DMS as the MS solution of managing
> content.....with MS-CMS being something that is pulled out in
> emergencies when the potential customer digs their heals in and asks
for
> true WCMS....so I can understand where Jerry is coming from on this
> one....
> 
> Regards
> Steve
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Daniel Reardon [mailto:[email protected]]
> 	Sent: Thu 24/02/2005 16:56
> 	To: Jerry Santelli; [email protected]
> 	Cc:
> 	Subject: RE: [CMS] [Microsoft-based solution for a portal + CMS
> system]:Microsoft SharePoint portal + Microsoft CMS ?
> 
> 
> 
> 	Jerry
> 
> 	Unbelievable!!!!!!
> 
> 	Your comments below are 100% , irrefutably incorrect regarding
> MCMS
> 	future. We are on the Microsoft Global Advisory Council for
> Portals
> 	advising Microsoft on the next version of CMS and SPS right now.
> I can
> 	confirm there is further development and a very strong new
> release is
> 	being built as I type. Although under NDA, rest assured a very
> strong
> 	strategy is in place.
> 
> 	That said Ektron is 100% .NET based. However if you are
> concerned about
> 	Microsoft's commitment to CMS (which is entirely unfounded!!!),
> surely
> 	you must be equally concerned regarding not just the future of
> Ektron
> 	CMS 400, but also Ektron as a company. Let's face it Microsoft
> are not
> 	likely to go bust, I'm not so confident about Ektron.
> 
> 	Either way, I guess you choose!!!
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: [email protected]
> 	[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerry
> Santelli
> 	Sent: 24 February 2005 16:10
> 	To: [email protected]
> 	Subject: RE: [CMS] [Microsoft-based solution for a portal + CMS
> system]
> 	:Microsoft SharePoint portal + Microsoft CMS ?
> 
> 
> 	I see a lot of people recommending the MS CMS.  We actually
> chose not to
> 	use it for clients that require an ASP .NET based CMS based on
> the fact
> 	that the product is in maintenance mode for what I have read.
> This
> 	means no further development will be done to the development of
> the
> 	product.
> 
> 	We have used Ektron for client installs where we can write ASP
> code and
> 	use the .NET architecture.  They have a CMS built on the .NET
> framework
> 	called CMS 400 (http://ektron.com/cms400.aspx).  One thing that
> is
> 	attractive to us was the release schedule of new updates and
> features as
> 	well as the stability.  When a new version was released we knew
> that it
> 	was going to work.  It also has an integration to SharePoint.
> 
> 	Just my 2 cents.
> 
> 	-Jerry
> 
> 	Jerry Santelli
> 	Fusion Productions
> 	http://www.fusionproductions.com
> 	ph: 585-872-1900
> 	fax: 585-872-2014
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	cms mailing list
> 	[email protected]
> 	Subscription controls:
> 	http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms
> 	Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr],
> 	[contentmanagers], [cmpros]
> http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 	This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for
> the addressee(s) only, and may contain confidential information. The
> unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any
> information contained within it is strictly prohibited and may be
> illegal. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
author
> and delete this e-mail immediately in its entirety. This footnote also
> confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by a virus checker
for
> the presence of known computer viruses. This statement does not
> constitute an acceptance of liability on the part of Artemis
Corporation
> or its employees in the event of technical or virus issues generated
by
> this e-mail. It is the responsibility of the recipient to take
adequate
> security measures.
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	cms mailing list
> 	[email protected]
> 	Subscription controls:
> 	http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms
> 	Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr],
> [contentmanagers], [cmpros]
> 	http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cms mailing list
> [email protected]
> Subscription controls:
> http://lists.cms-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/cms
> Netiquette FAQ and related CMS lists - [cms-forum], [cms-pr],
> [contentmanagers], [cmpros]
> http://www.cmsreview.com/NetiquetteFAQ.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.