Re: Re: Revamp of FarCry Docs

Matthew Attanasio <matthew-s5+8xnkFq1N97EbBUNGEsFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.farcry.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey Justin

Most of the component packages section everything excluding the the coapi, 
dbgateways and events are missing content that either errors with a "Connection 
Failure" or takes you too http://docs.farcrycore.org/trunk/some-something 
which is belive is not the intended outcome.

Types and formtools are not showing any useful content at all.

Also while I am here, I found it very easy to search though the list of 
tags components in the old version by using the browser page text search to 
find a particular method. 
Currently with the new design I find it much slower to use now that 
everything is broken down into individual pages. 

Will you guys be implementing a search on the docs, that would 
be extremely handy ;)

Also I take it there are no links to the old farcry docs at the moment?

On Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:26:25 AM UTC+10:30, Justin Carter wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Can you let us know of any missing content and broken links that you find 
> and we'll try to address them?
>
> cheers,
> Justin
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Attanasio <
> mat...-s5+8xnkFq1N97EbBUNGEsFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hey Geoff
>>
>> was just wondering when the content of the new farcry docs will be 
>> updated, currently there are a lot of broken links and missing content. 
>> I use to docs an a regular basis and find the current state of the docs 
>> not very helpful, even for the time being is there a way to access the old 
>> farcry docs as I will be more then happy to keep using that?
>>
>> Regards Matthew
>>
>>
>> On Friday, December 21, 2012 11:32:54 AM UTC+10:30, Geoff Bowers wrote:
>>>
>>> Yikes.. just realised I posted against the wrong thread earlier... quick 
>>> recap for those that missed it.
>>>
>>> FarCry docs v2 is up and running:
>>> http://docs.farcrycore.org/**trunk/ <http://docs.farcrycore.org/trunk/>
>>>
>>> Trunk of core is up for now, and we'll be adding all the 6.x maintenance 
>>> branches in due course. If you seen anything wrong or out of date let us 
>>> know!
>>>
>>> GB
>>>
>>> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:05:06 PM UTC+11, Geoff Bowers wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> FarCry Docs (http://docs.farcrycore.org/) site holds an extract of all 
>>>> the inline help extracted from the code base.  It's all marvellous stuff, 
>>>> especially if you want to know what custom tags are available, what 
>>>> attributes you use for what formtool and more.  However, it looks a little 
>>>> bit ratty, and the documentation generation engine needs to be updated.
>>>>
>>>> Daemonite Maya has been working away on a new set of templates to house 
>>>> the new content output we're working on.  This will also entail a change in 
>>>> the content hierarchy amongst other things.
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at the static prototype:
>>>> http://db.tt/2KAyI2SJ
>>>>
>>>> Let us know what you think, and anything else you think we should add.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>>
>>>> -- geoff
>>>> http://www.daemon.com.au/
>>>> skype. gb.daemon
>>>> twitter. @modius
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google 
>> group.
>> To post, email: farcr...-/[email protected] <javascript:>
>> To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+...-/[email protected] <javascript:>
>> For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
>> --------------------------------
>> Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: farcry-dev-/[email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe-/[email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.