Open Source CMS Solutions
"Matthew Clapp" <nautis-/[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jan 2004 15:32:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
CMSers - My first CMS experience was implementing Vignette back in 1998. I was introduced to the bizzarro world of TCL (pronounced "tickle") and Vignette's strange architecture. Up until the time I entered consulting I had always fared just fine with open source software. I had created psychology web journals and a peer review process all in perl with mySQL running on Apache. All for free. There is a website I've had running since 1996 with the same perl scripts and the same database that hasn't gone down once in 7 years. No COTs CMS vendor can make the same claim. Of course, the usual rebuttal is that perl and PHP are not robust enough development platforms to do serious development on. I totally disagree and have a pile of evidence and experience to support my opinion. What's Going On? As a management consultant, I have usually walked into companies baffled at the fact that the CIO had already purchased a content management system before developing a business case or in many cases, even consulting the business. If I learned anything during the bubble it is that technology without a business strategy is completely useless. In many cases, it was not only useless - it hurt the bottom line of companies who thought they were doing the right thing. Don't get me wrong, there is a time and a place for implementing the big guns: Interwoven, Documentum, Vignette, etc. In my experience, only about 10% of the time are these software juggernauts actually necessary. Usually purchased in a vacuum to do a proof-of-concept these products bring millions of dollars in tag-on consulting fees. It really is out of control. The Truth From the Trenches There are some interesting statistics that CIOs should be aware of before making the leap: 20% to 25% of CMS solutions will become shelfware (Gartner). At around a million dollars an implementation, this is really pretty expensive shelfware. The truth is that there are open source solutions like Mambo Open Source that are an excellent way to pilot how your organization will respond to content management. Mambo is not Interwoven, but then again most organizations don't need Interwoven. I don't know about you, but before I drop a couple million bucks on an unproven technology, I would certainly want to pilot a proof of concept with a free content management tool like Mambo. There is even a web site (www.opensourcecms.com) that provided free demonstrations of several of the web's most popular open source content management systems. Test the waters and see how far you can push these free solutions. More importantly, see how your organization will respond to these new changes in they way they do their work. Matthew Clapp [email protected] -- http://cms-list.org/ please trim your posts.