RE: RE: Professional Services
Michael Kimsal <[email protected]> Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:15:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1073607351.2226.51.camel@localhost> |
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 17:37, Drew Volpe wrote: > One suggestion I have is to negotiate a fixed price contract up > front. CMS projects can quickly get expensive as there's a > million different directions in which they can be taken. It's > very easy for a consultant to keep adding small, incremental > features which can quickly double or triple the project's cost. > Wow, on this end we generally see the opposite - clients adding small, incremental features, but not wanting to pay for them. And then wondering why things get behind schedule, and why they keep being told 'no' all the time. Fixed price is going to likely burn both sides, because human nature is generally to want to make changes during development. I'm talking about clients. If devs do extra work outside the scope without being asked to, tough nuts on them - they shouldn't bill for that. But if a fixed price is put together, generally the client will be told 'no' a whole lot from a 'good' dev team, or will be told 'yes' from a bad team who will get WAY behind schedule, skimping on the rest of the project which was agreed to beforehand. What needs to happen in most projects is a time and material approach with *regular* communication (like, every couple days at least). That way there are no surprises budget-wise when changes come up. "Yes we can do that, and it'll be an extra 26 hours and push things back 1 week. Do we go ahead?" -- --------------------------------------------------------- Michael Kimsal 734-480-9961 http://www.tapinternet.com - PHP training and development http://www.logicreate.com - LogiCreate development system -- http://cms-list.org/ please trim your posts.