Re: Re: DHTML browsers [was Accessibility]

> > produce clean code. I haven't seen someone put together an
> > editor that didn't make use of these technologies while
> > avoiding Active-X or Java.
>
> Then you haven't seen Xopus. This editor produces valid XML (valid to
> schemas defined by you). Not only is it WYSIWYG, but it's
"multi-WYSIWYG":
> select a stylesheet, and the content being edited is re-rendered using
a

You're right! I haven't seen Xopus. It's pretty good. My main complaint
would be its speed. It's not as reactive as I'd like and at a 600kb
download, I'm not surprised.

-js