Re: Too many options, need advice on web CMS
Victor Markwart <markwart-iMDvLBO0GCq6c6uEtOJ/[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:55:30 +1000 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You should look at MySource http://www.squiz.net It's open source, runs on Apache using PHP scales well see stats at http://webalizer.cwis.uwa.edu.au/ (the University of WA is running on a single Pentium III server). There is documentation and a community bulletin board see http://mysource.squiz.net/community/ The UWA runs their whole site with 1.5 admin staff and they have something like 200 editors Regards Victor -- Every time you say you don't believe in Windows taking over the world, a Microsoft marketing executive dies. On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Brian Hill wrote: > I never realized how crowded the CMS market is! Our college has hemorrhaged > 90% of its web staff over the past couple of years, and we're trying to > implement a CMS to delegate some of the web content maintenance to our end > users. In addition, we are trying to eliminate an MS FrontPage based hosting > environment in favor of something browser based and simpler to use. I've > already spoken with several vendors, but I'd like to hear from this lists > users and make sure I'm not missing any good ones. Our requirements are: > > * Must have native multi-site support. We have an in-house hosting > environment with multiple sites per server. > * Must have native multi-lingual capability (English/Spanish), and > we'd really prefer integrated translation tools (though they are optional). > * Prefer LDAP authentication, but will settle for NT only...we just > need our AD to authenticate the editors. > * Prefer versioning and workflow control features. > * Must run on Windows 2000 Server (no CF based solutions though. Java > and PERL OK). > * Must support SQL Server 7 or Oracle 9i. > * Must support the creation of unlimited sub-sites (for private > faculty websites). > * Must utilize a 100% browser based, mouse driven website development > environment. > * MUST (repeat) MUST be exceedingly easy to use...math teachers don't > make the best web developers. > * Must offer a site licensing option. With over 20 domains, 1000 > editors, and seven servers, per "x" licensing quickly becomes cost > prohibitive for us. > * Must allow the use of fixed templates, and allow us to restrict > which templates are available where > * CMS's that are cognizant of the requirements of Section 508 and > disabled users are strongly preferred. > * Must allow non-technical users to create email and DB based forms > for the websites without programming knowledge. > * Users shouldn't have to learn a single line of HTML > * Must be relatively easy to install and administer (if I have to > spend 2 weeks in a classroom just to learn to install the program, I'm not > going to bother). > * Must be reasonably priced and quickly implementable. As a state > funded public college, we don't have $200,000 to drop or six months to wait. > > > All suggestions are welcome. > > Brian Hill > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > -- > http://cms-list.org/ > more signal, less noise. > -- http://cms-list.org/ more signal, less noise.