Re: worflow question
Stéphane Croisier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.jahia.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Beta this Spring. But you may already test most of the new workflow code as it is already developed and committed in the Jahia CVS. Cheers Stéphane At 13:23 21/01/2005, you wrote: >Thanks Stephane, > >Do you know when the next version will be released ? > >Thanks >Sébastien >----- Original Message ----- >From: <mailto:[email protected]>Stéphane Croisier >To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:07 AM >Subject: Re: worflow question > > >Hello, > >This is not possible with Jahia 4.0 but will be possible with the next >release. Next version of Jahia will include several imporvements on the >workflow side and you will be able to customize for a given page (and by >inheritance the sub-pages): >- No worklfow at all. Content directly goes live >- N steps basic worklfow (like today but not limited to 2 steps) >- Full native integration with a Business Processing Server (Senseï >module) compliant with the bpml standard (www.bpmi.org) > >Cheers >Stéphane > >At 14:25 19/01/2005, you wrote: >>Hi, >>I'm exploring the concept of the rights in Jahia, and i have a question >>about workflow : >>Is there possible to have many user with admin right(for publish page) >>for a page in order to publish page if all the admin user have validate >>the changes in the page OR the higher admin user have validate.? >>Ex : >> >>tree site : >>home_page -> section1 ->.. >> -> section2 -> .. >> ... >>for example, >>i would define user1 (with rw )in section1, user2 (with rwa) in section1 >>and user3(with rwa) in home_page >>and i would have section in publication if >>(user2 has validate changes AND user3 have validate changes) >>or >>user3 have validate changes. >> >> >> >>For resume, i would have many validation level, and publication is ok if >>all admin user have validate OR the higher admin user have validate. >> >>Yet, if i would have only user2 for validate publication, i would block >>inherance of user3 for the section1. >> >> >>Thanks for response and sorry for my english >> >>Sebastien jaussaud >>Ville de Marseille >> >>