Re: [PROPOSAL] Editor actions

On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> +1 for all of these actions.
> 

+1

> Thanks for summarizing!
> 

+1

salu2

> -- Andreas
> 
> 
> Am 09.07.10 11:42, schrieb Richard Frovarp:
> > We've had some discussions here at RMLL about our editors, and here is
> > what is being proposed.
> >
> > Kupu
> > -------------------
> > Move Kupu into the unsupported contributor modules area. Kupu hasn't
> > been updated in a long time, and their website from what I can tell is
> > offline. This editor doesn't appear to be used by many. It causes user
> > impression problems as it doesn't work properly under IE or Firefox due
> > to our schema.
> >
> >
> > BXE
> > --------------
> > The proposal is to change the default rng we use. This would break out
> > of the box support for BXE. Instructions need to be posted on how to
> > easily make the rng changes to make BXE work.
> >
> >
> > Multi-Forms
> > ------------------
> > Drop the forms editor to the unsupported contributor modules section.
> > The source editor is vastly better. This code could be quite useful for
> > other sorts of projects, however.
> >
> > FCKEditor
> > -------------------
> > Move to the contributor modules section. I haven't been tracking changes
> > to the CKEditor project, although I probably could get it going
> > relatively quickly. Community seems to be in favor of TinyMCE over CK.
> >
> > TinyMCE
> > ---------------
> > Tighten up our TinyMCE integration. Change the rng to support a larger
> > subset of XHTML than BXE currently does. Provide crystal clear
> > instructions on how to install TinyMCE in a getting started guide.
> >
> > Firedocs
> > ----------------
> > Move from contributor into main project. Would be promoted as our best
> > arbitrary XML editor and supplant BXE in that role. It should play
> > nicely with the expanded RNG schema used to support TinyMCE. Need to
> > figure out a good plan for distributing the actual Firefox module for
> > ease of use for the end user and for automatic updates.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------
> >
> > What do others think about any of these action items?
> >
> > Richard
> 
> 

-- 
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions>