Re: Cocoon branch or release?

On 07/13/2010 08:06 AM, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Am 13.07.10 13:04, schrieb Richard Frovarp:
>> On 07/11/2010 04:50 PM, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> Am 09.07.10 13:46, schrieb [email protected]:
>>>> Author: rfrovarp
>>>> Date: Fri Jul 9 11:46:48 2010
>>>> New Revision: 962487
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=962487&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Getting untranslated errors again.
>>>> Will investigate once back in the states.
>>>
>>> the reason for the untranslated error is that the IncludeTransformer
>>> in Cocoon 2.1.11 doesn't yet support the strip-root attribute which
>>> resulted in an invalid catalogue XML. I just committed a workaround
>>> since I didn't do an SVN update after your change and noticed too late
>>> that this was due to the different Cocoon version. I guess I should
>>> revert my change now.
>>>
>>> BTW, the missing support for the strip-root attribute also causes
>>> errors with the news module. So I think we should stick with the 2.1.X
>>> branch of Cocoon instead of the 2.1.11 release.
>>>
>> I would like to stick with Cocoon 2.1.11. However, I'm taking it that
>> your workaround won't fix the news module as well?
>
> This is correct. I started adding the necessary workarounds for the 
> news module, but this was not as trivial as with the i18n module.
>
> WDOT? Should we use Cocoon 2.1.11 or the current 2.1.X branch or a 
> particular revision of the 2.1.X branch?
>
> -- Andreas
>
>

If we can't do 2.1.11, I would have to go with a particular revision of 
2.1.x. Fix it like we have for releases to the current one. Any track 
the Cocoon 2.1.x updates enough to know when we would need to update? 
Are they thinking about a 2.1.12 release?

Richard