Re: Release 2.1?

Hi Richard
>
> Thanks for looking into and asking the dev. I would think we would 
> need legal to check out the license before we shipped it. It would be 
> far more preferable for it to just use a standard approved license, 
> such as MIT. At least with a standard license, you know where you're 
> at, even if it isn't a friendly one.
>
>
I chased the Dev again as we have now created the module and would be a 
shame to not be able to include it with Lenya:

> Hi Vik
>
> I'd be happy to release it under the MIT licence, which seems to be 
> the most permissive licence.
>
> Will post on GitHub soon as I get a chance.
>
> You can use this email as written permission from me, the author, 
> releasing the source code under the MIT licence.
>
> Best
> P.
So I think maybe we are in business?

Regards



Vik