Re: Release 2.1
Rudolf Korhummel <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:15:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.lenya.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Lenya Devs, Does it mean that we have to remove all binary libraries before we can do the new release ? If yes: Would it be good to use maven instead of ant ? I'm not familiar with maven, but it seems to that it will take some time to do it. If we want to release soon, I think it would be good if we can move this step to a later release. WDYT Rudolf > On 12/16/2012 08:42 AM, Rudolf Korhummel wrote: >> Hi Lenya Devs, >> >> I would like to start a discussion about the possibility to release >> 2.1 >> >> Our last release was about 20 month ago and the activity in the >> community is low so a new release in the near future would be a good >> thing to reactivate the project. >> >> From MPOV we don't need much new features , but a new state of the >> art >> design of the default publication would be necessary. It might also >> be >> useful to have a simple publication which can be used by new users >> to >> build there publications on top. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Are there some devs around who can help ? I think I will have time >> after >> christmas to work on this. >> >> Best >> Rudolf >> > > There's been quite a bit of discussion about releases recently. I'd > have to do some digging to find out which list it was on: infra, > board, or members. Basically it came down to that source releases > shouldn't include binaries in them, at least not binary libraries. > Our releases contain all of those libraries, so it would go against > that. I'll have to spend some time tracking down what the decision > was. Using something like Maven obviously removes that problem. > > Richard > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >