Re: Editor poll

I agree. I use TinyMCE and the source editor, because I got them to
work reasonably well -- not perfectly though.

Personally, I don't really care which editor is used, as long as it
works well. The big challenge IMO is to stay reasonably up-to-date
with it; browser updates tend to break dynamic user interfaces, which
means that a few-years-old editor will very likely have a number of
blocker-level issues when used with current-generation browsers.
TinyMCE as it is is just barely good enough; UI- and feature-wise it's
fine, it just has occasional hiccups, and I've had to disable some
features to stop users from mangling the pages. But if there's a
better alternative out there, I would have no objections to switching.

I would much prefer a simple editor with stripped-down functionality
that's solid as a rock to one that's more feature-rich but a little
bit flaky.

I know this isn't easy; even Google has trouble getting the Blogger
editor to work decently even on their own browser, and they certainly
don't want for resources.

/Petteri

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Richard Frovarp <[email protected]> wrote:
> We support way too many editors, making it difficult for a new person to get
> up and running quickly. I think we need to support one or two editors really
> well. We can certainly support more.
>
> What editor do you use? What editor do you think needs better support?
>
> Richard
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>