Re: CTI Integration
"Sebastian Reitenbach" <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:56:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | L00 bugdead prods. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey, [email protected] wrote: > On Mar 28, 2007, at 13:55, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > But I'll buy into your part about home users, although I still > > suspect > > they constitute sub-1% of the work force using a PBX or PBX-like. But > > even in that case [connected over a true broadband VPN] you will have > > the ability to resolve the device name (DNS/WINS). Very little of the > > technology of a modern WAN/LAN works well at all without DNS/WINS, > > including Kerberos and CIFS. > > I think Sebastian is quite focused on the setup in his company, which > obviously is quite forward thinking ;-) > > So maybe we should stop discussing the general PBX world ;-) The > suggestion made by Sebastian is still valid, using the logged in > account instead of the client machine IP to lookup the required > endpoint for callouts is a very useful addition. > I think in practice both methods are required depending on the setup. > Ok, got it, I'll add a Default, so that the Admin can decide, how it should work, take a look at the IP of the clients, or take a look at something related to the users accout information, most likely a telephone number ;) > So if the IP=>phone default is set, the dialer should use it. If it > isn't or if the IP could not be found, a dialer should scan the > telephones of the login account for numbers which are managed by the > PBX associated with it. Yes, If that IP=>phone default is set, it should be used as a fallback, I can do it this way. > > As mentioned I do *not* understand why a different phone number type > is required. The dialer should know which numbers it can dial. So it > just needs to iterate over the available numbers and pick the first > which is associated with the dialer. Eg by checking for some prefix. or suffix, e.g. sip phone numbers usually look like this: [email protected] nevertheless, so I should make it configurable whether to match a prefix or suffix... kind regards Sebastian -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss